Thursday, October 25, 2007

A proper response to the attack on Oink and music piracy, in poetic verse.

"Walk the Plank Little Piggies"

She's under the weather,
and over my head.
So, I sit with a bottom of rum
and seas of open music forums:

I drink alone to the goldmine of
Japanese pop, Krautrock, Fuzz-Folk,
Intelligent Dance Music, Electronic,
Ambient, Noise pop, Baroque pop,
Psychedelic Balearic Rock, Westernized
African music, 'Graceland' pop, Trip-hop,
Math rock, Shoegazing
and mainstream-hazing music from the
underground in D minor;
the saddest key in the seven seas.

The RIAA certifies gold.
I pillage it from them
via the plugged-in piracy community.

The men with black umbrellas
and skinny white ties
come to me in the night
as torrents of acid raindrops resonate melodies
in the key of C.

They ask politely with their Polish faces,
"How insane have you gone
on a scale of one to insane?"
I can't come to answer them.

"After him! Alert the authorities!
Wowee Zowee! Superlatives!"

I grab my booty and run,
and as I run,
I sink my feet deep in vinyl from 1974
and dirty dance cassette tapes from 1985.
I shuffle to Bob Dylan's blues
and hide to the ambient tones of Brian Eno.

Who is out to get me? Who could be jealous of me?
Politicians. Pianists. Pessimists.
Optimists. Atheists. Contortionists.
Cartoonists. Communists. Child psychiatrists.
Dentists. Massage Therapists. Vending Machinists.

And every one of the 'ists' is pissed to hear,
I've been watching my weight; it isn't going anywhere.

Now I ask, "Who's the wiser-
me, or the grim reaper?"

Lump me into any genre you want,
I'll chameleon my way into it.
Since I weep to the major keys,
Just don't depend on it.

--------
That's it. Want some Japanese Pop? Listen to this album as well as his Night Piece (namewise- akin to Chopin's Nocturnes): www.myspace.com/shugotokumaru

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

In rainbows and out the other.

Radiohead- In Rainbows

It's here, and everybody is tossing out their half-baked-from-the-listening-party-last-night reviews. It's good, so the only debate is determining just how good it is. Yes, this is the same album that I had previously speculated would:

Cure the common cold, feed starving children, promote world peace, get you a job, enhance your sex life, make you faster, inspire you, and, most importantly, conquer the year end lists!


Yet, so far, this album release has only resulted in my fourteen full listens, incessant browsing of message boards and pseudo-album art, debate and postponing of school work. After the initial announcement, I refused to listen to Radiohead until I heard the new album so as to cleanse my mind. Then, after the digital release, I continued my banning of Radiohead's previous output until just yesterday so I could assess this album on its own merit. Since it's good, and it's Radiohead, the next question is: is it perfect?

How do we quantify a perfect album? Prior to one of my fourteen listens, Carly and I were at Applebee's when she opted for the 'perfect margarita'. She didn't order the Pablo Honey margarita (barely above average) or even the Funeral margarita (so close to perfect, but I'm not sure I'd trust a margarita with 'funeral' as its adjectival calling card). No, this was billed as the Kid A of margaritas. Since I'm not a margarita connoisseur, the only aspect I can legitimately compliment is the quantity of the drink. The tin-can allowed her to fill the glass four times until the point of satiation. After four listens to In Rainbows, I wasn't ready to tag this album as perfect, but I was ready for four more listens.

There is some evidence to indicate the brilliance of In Rainbows, even if it is merely conspiracy theories and fun finds. A few folks on the greenplastic.com message boards discovered that In Rainbows has a moment akin to that of Kid A. As with the electronic murmers of 'Kid A' at the start of "Everything in Its Right Place", you can hear the album title in the backing vocals of "Reckoner". At the 2 minute, 49 second marker, you can hear:

"In rain / in rain / in rainbows"

To compliment this historic find, there is also talk of this moment beginning precisely at the album's golden section. Artists and architects since the Renaissance have proportioned their works to approximate this Golden Ratio, which appears at 1.618, or about 61.8% of the way through a work of art. The album length is 42:34, or 2554 seconds, in length. The Golden Section of In Rainbows, then, is 2554s/1.6180339887 = 1578.45s, which as noted before is the 2:49 'In Rainbows' backing vocal found within "Reckoner".

What does this tell us? The only way we can grasp such an album is to depict the inherent experience of said-album. The entire album plays out like a disturbingly romantic tale to tell your kids. "Yay!" As with the children cheering amidst the churning gears and fuzzy textures of "15 Step", the opening two songs are an exciting introduction akin to someone screeching to a halt next to your rainy, late night walk in the city. You're pulled inside by a couple masked men and taken to a damp basement in the middle of town as the warm guitars of "Bodysnatchers" detail your drive through the night. You'd be frightened already if not for the fact that "15 Step" is the best album opener Radiohead has written since "2+2=5 (The Lukewarm.)". Oh, wait.

The rest of the album will haunt its way into your heart as "Nude" functions as your subdued response to the captors. And to think, you've been trying to say the same thing since the OK Computer-era, but could never put it to tape as eloquently as now. Naturally, you respond to the mysterious men:

"You'll go to hell / for what your dirty mind is thinking"

Your initial pensive retaliation is met with chains and bad dreams. "Weird Fishes/Arpeggi" is your submission: "I'd be crazy not to follow / follow where you lead / your eyes, they turn me". Yet, the real reasoning behind the obedience is found in the final lines of this piece of your story: "I hit the bottom / hit the bottom and escape".

Why fight it when you can feign obedience like "an animal / trapped in your hot car"? The subsequent song, "All I Need", has an outro complete with piano and cymbals crashing that reminds you of the paranoid feeling of the walls symphonically closing in around you. How much longer can this take? When can you ever realistically hope to escape?

"Faust Arp" is the interlude that soundtracks the moment one of the captors wakes you from your upright, chained slumber with Franz Schubert's "Unfinished Symphony" draining your conscious in the distance. As with this Radiohead melody, the 'unfinished' classical music is truncated. Your captor leans towards your ear with the eerily soothing line, "wakey wakey rise and shine". You'd laugh if the situation permitted it.

As the golden section nears, "Reckoner" is your introspection. You begin to see shades of yourself in your captors' black masks. Is this a phase of Stockholm syndrome or do you merely miss your own reflection? You find comfort in the puddle on the cement floor from the heavy rain almost a week ago. Has it been that long? The light from the cracked door on the top of the steps reflects within the puddle, and you'd swear you could see a rainbow. There is hope.

"House of Cards" is the captor's response to your eternal pessimism and resolute ennui. As one of them seductively approaches your locked position, you close your eyes and imagine the outside world once more. You're back at the university. You're walking from the parking structure and staring upward towards the Renaissance-inspired architecture. Denial. You're not there; this isn't happening. Whoop, wrong album.

"Words are a sawed-off shotgun", you used to think. Now, you're just trying to "wish away the nightmare", but you've reached the end. "Jigsaw Falling into Place" is your last attempt, and oddly first real attempt, to escape. The rape of your former ego has found you desperate and alone.

The captors resolve that it isn't worth the effort to keep you alive much longer. "Videotape" will stand as your goodbye to everyone you once knew. The plunking piano chords are your memory. The drums tell you to speed things up. You haven't much longer before the last blow to the head. As with everything real you once knew, the drums dissolve into almost an indistinguishable form of their previous existence. Were they really drums, or was it the flapping film of a broken projector? You can hardly remember as you mouth the words: "this is my way of saying goodbye / because I can't do it face-to-face".

The only problem with your final goodbye, "Videotape", is that the rest of us are left wanting the rest of the story: the part we may never know. Due to this relatively weak, somber closing moment, it is very difficult to perceive In Rainbows as a perfect album. It's a good thing, then, that there's still the discbox with eight extra songs coming in December.

If we did base perfection on the 'margarita principle' of more is better, then these eight extra songs would really boost the score. In this instance, 69 Love Songs would be beyond perfect and In Rainbows would be just right. Since we don't define music on the quality measurement of margaritas, then here's the real rub of In Rainbows and the rest of the Radiohead oeuvre, and the rest of you reviewers can just disagree to agree:

Kid A: 10
OK Computer: 9.8
In Rainbows: 9.4
Hail to the Thief: 9.2
Amnesiac: 8.9
The Bends: 8.5
Pablo Honey: 5.9

Friday, October 5, 2007

It's time to take a stand.

“Warning: Abortion Is Not Genocide” by Michael Tkach

I am not one that ever finds himself offended, and I am by the mural-sized abortion photography that was to be found on campus Wednesday and Thursday compliments of the Genocide Awareness Project. I do not perceive this to be an exercise of free speech, more like an attack on decency. Since they stationed themselves in front of my home base (Debartolo, home of the English department) instead of somewhere where I can ignore them, I am doubly at arms.

Throughout four and one-half years, with this being my final semester, I cannot recall any other moment where a display required gates and security. Why? We don’t want them there; it’s that simple. We want a riot. Students were left with two choices:

A) Lower their heads and pretend it didn’t exist.
B) Confront it, and spend the rest of the day annoyed.

The fact is that no one is going to be ‘moved’ by this grotesque display of dead fetuses apart from the impulse to move far away from it. You will not be successful in changing opinions or 'raising awareness' on shock value alone. That only works on South Park. These aren’t evil people, just misguided people, and what can you do?

You can point out that their arguments are offensive or plain silly. They trivialized the true implications of the term ‘genocide’. It is not meant to be the systematic destruction of babies. If you have an abortion, you are not a Nazi. You are not participating in a larger evil scheme to destroy the youth of America. At its worst, abortion can be considered infanticide. This is not equal to genocide.

You cannot provide the definition in Webster’s New World Encyclopedia, “The deliberate and systematic destruction of a national, racial, religious, political, cultural, ethnic, or OTHER GROUP defined by the exterminators as undesirable”, and highlight the vague oversight in the definition so that it applies to your argument. How many definitions did they leaf through until they came across one that is as loose as their idea of the women they’re targeting?

I will not attack this campaign/project from every angle; they simply do not deserve the attention. You cannot attempt to justify your position by providing a pamphlet that refers to the plight of others (African Americans, Jewish, the animal kingdom, Native Americans and even women and homosexuals) while making futile comparisons to your own assertion. Establish solid ground for your own argument first, instead of the mute, ludicrous notion that abortions increase the odds of breast cancer.

Although this project was funded by some Republicans, of course many don’t support this; they are the sensible ones. But, let’s assume everyone involved holds standard views associated with Republicans since they already trust in this radical idea. Then, remind me why you are relating homosexual rights to abortion. Unless, of course, you’ve decided that you support homosexual rights now on the grounds that they cannot have children of their own and the only available option open to them is adoption. Okay, I see it now; you have to support them now by default since homosexuals wouldn’t have abortions.

As I stood nearby the display, I overheard many debates. One individual was arguing that a woman shouldn’t abort out of mere inconvenience. Well, is rape convenient? And if you’re ready to promote the abolishment of all forms of abortion, then you must embrace the concept that ‘killing is killing is killing’. Similarly, you cannot justify any moral grounds of war or euthanasia.

If abortion was made illegal, we would still have black market abortions. If we truly wish to look out for the welfare of women, then we should be able to accommodate healthy procedures. For instance, we wouldn’t close down the clinics that provide clean syringes to heroin addicts. If that is a far stretch, then consider the abstinence campaign: they may promote abstinence, but they still hand out condoms because they’re aware that if you choose to disobey their wishes, then they’d rather you do so safely.

What if I were to combat distasteful arguments with some of my own? After all, the only reason I’m pro-choice is because I believe in population control. I’ll see your illogical arguments and raise you some of my own. If sperm is a life form, then am I only ¾ of a human being since I have varicocele, a decreased sperm count and may even be infertile? I also believe in a right to my own body, and since I cannot rightfully speak for the female population, I’ll speak on behalf of my voiceless sperm. Even if you use a condom, which is stated to be 98% effective, you can technically only be 2% at fault if a pregnancy does occur. Is it really worth it to call 2% of me a Nazi? In this instance, it isn’t even fair to Nazis.

Honestly, I’m very skeptical of the facts provided by both sides because I’m not enough in the know to check their validity. So, perhaps I’m really not the best source. I should let someone smarter decide, such as the justices involved in the Roe v Wade decision. I may be wrong, but since arguments apparently do not require proper support, then I should add that I believe the majority of those justices were Republicans too. They placed their political affiliations aside to make a proper assessment that is best for the people and abides by the Constitution.

I’m aware abortion is a touchy subject. You can hate me, but I don’t hate you. I love you, but I’d love you even more if you didn’t shove your bloated views down my proverbial throat. Please send all hate (electronic) mail to MichaelT2003@comcast.net where it will promptly be ignored and aborted from my mailbox.

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Supermen and those that are less than.

So, I might've uncovered a secret identity yesterday when I saw what seemed to be the same person in Bliss Hall at YSU as a student and later at work in Circuit City as a supervisor.

I confronted this person:

"Sean Petiya, you must be like Superman. I swear I saw you earlier on campus as a regular human being. Now, you're here as a supervisor. You even have super powers such as adjusting time sheets and price changing abilities!"

It isn't often you see this sort of thing.

What you do see often: people on campus with training wheels on their backpacks so they can lug them behind themselves. C'mon! Be a man (or woman).

Okay okay, if you're going to do it, at least don't drag the backpack up the steps. Pick the damn thing up.

Also, note the different connotations of these similar words: 'backpack' and 'bookbag'. The former implies that it is to be worn on the back. The latter implies it is to be carried or, ahem, dragged.

You know, I don't recall ever having a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles backpack with training wheels as a kid. No, I went straight to backpackin', and I even had the lunchbox to match.

Speaking of which, I'm hungry.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

15 Steps, then a shear drop.

So, Sunday night, I returned home around 2am from the great 2+ hour set of the Flaming Lips at Cleveland's Agora to discover the single greatest music development, ever.

I might as well join the blogger mania currently invested in the 'unexpected' announcement of Radiohead's LP7 (entitled In Rainbows) a mere ten days prior to its digital release for a price that you determine.

I don't mean to say I told you so, but I told you so.

Okay, so I may have just mentioned in passing that Radiohead should just release the album themselves due to their lack of a label. They're only the greatest band in the world with a trusting fanbase, why not?

Since I purchased the 40 pound/81 USD 'discbox', I really hope their plan all along wasn't this: Become the greatest band in the world. Gain trust from fans. Release highly anticipated and long overdue 7th LP through band website with comforting option of paying nothing for a download. Scam us all and take our cash.

Forget In Rainbows, because there's a pot o' gold In their Pockets.

"Take the money. Run. Take the money. Run. Take the money."

Reality of the BEST NEWS of 2007 (as opposed to the previous 'worst news of 2007' when it was initially announced that the album wouldn't release until 2008 and the inherent uncertainty): the Animal Collective/Panda Bear albums that previously had a stranglehold on the top two albums of 2007 have a veteran challenger after all.

So, what will the result be? Will Person Pitch and Strawberry Jam remain the top of the 2007 heap? Or, will the abstract pop fall victim to the art rock otherworldly goodness of Radiohead's In Rainbows?

October 10th, I await your verdict. I hate to get my hopes up, only to have them shattered (example: Neon Bible was a bit of a letdown due to the obvious excitement over a new Arcade Fire release). Of course, it could also play out like LCD Soundsystem's Sound of Silver, which evoked a negative reaction upon first listen before subsequent listens had me craving more analog fuzz. On a similar note, I'm seeing both aforementioned bands (Arcade Fire/LCD Soundsystem) in Columbus this Friday. Hurrah!

But, what do you think: will In Rainbows be the greatest album of the year or of the 21st century?